Policy No: 2068
Responsible Office: Title IX Office
Last Review Date: 10/07/2024
Next Required Review: 10/07/2029
|
Policy No: 2068
Responsible Office: Title IX Office
Last Review Date: 10/07/2024
Next Required Review: 10/07/2029
Sexual Misconduct & Complaint Resolution
1. Purpose
The èßäÊÓƵ (the “University”) is committed to establishing and maintaining an environment where individuals, regardless of gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation, are free from sex discrimination, sexual harassment, sexual violence, sexual coercion, domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, electronic stalking, and retaliation (collectively “sexual misconduct”).
The University considers sexual misconduct to be a serious offense because it undermines the atmosphere of trust and respect that is essential to a healthy University Community. As such, sexual misconduct violates the standards of our University Community and constitutes a violation of this policy.
Retaliation against any person who reports or assists in making a report of sexual misconduct or who participates in the investigation and resolution of a complaint in any way would violate the University’s Non-Retaliation Policy.
Complaints of retaliation may be subject to the same grievance procedures as complaints of sexual misconduct. The Non-Retaliation Policy can be found at: /departments/compliance/policylibrary/policy.html?doc=B5C676F7-6EF9-48B6-8EC3-F4DE87B0DF94 .
The University will promptly and thoroughly investigate and resolve all formal complaints of sexual misconduct in accordance with this policy and the Complaint Resolution Procedures. If the University determines that sexual misconduct occurred, the University will take prompt and effective remedial action to prevent the recurrence of the sexual misconduct, eliminate any hostile environment, and address the effects of misconduct on the complainant and others, if applicable.
While University employees, as described in Section 4.2.1.1 of this policy, are required to report sexual misconduct that they observe or learn about, the University takes seriously reports of sexual misconduct from any interested person.
The University has a designated Title IX Coordinator, Ms. Deidra Byas, who shall oversee the implementation and enforcement of this policy, compliance with applicable rules and regulations, and coordination of communications between campus and community partners. The Title IX Coordinator may be reached at (251) 460-7280 or deidrabyas@southalabama.edu. The Title IX Coordinator’s office is in the Athletic Annex Building, Suite 50. For detailed directions, please visit the Title IX Office website /departments/studentaffairs/titlenine/.
2. Applicability
Subject to Section 5.6 hereinbelow, this policy applies to all University employees, including administrators, faculty, adjunct faculty, and staff; employees of USA affiliates including but not limited to the èßäÊÓƵ Health Care Authority and its subsidiaries (collectively, “USAHCA”) and USA HealthCare Management, LLC (“USAHCM”); students; applicants for employment; customers; third-party contractors; and all other persons who participate in the University’s educational programs and activities, including third-party visitors on campus (the “University Community”). This policy does not apply to students, faculty, or staff participating in Study Abroad program activities that are facilitated outside of the United States.
3. Definitions
Complainant: An individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sexual misconduct.
Consensual Relationship: A consensual relationship is any relationship, past or present, that is romantic, intimate, or sexual in nature to which both parties give consent.
Effective consent may not exist when there is a disparity in power between the parties. An example is when one is in a supervisory or evaluative role over the other, such as a faculty member teaching a student or an administrator supervising an employee.
In addition, the appearance of a compromising conflict of interest or of coercion, favoritism, or bias is prejudicial to the interests of the University. Because of the significant power differential that exists between faculty and students, faculty members are prohibited from participating in sexual and/or romantic relationships with students enrolled in their classes or with students whom they otherwise evaluate, grade, or supervise. Similarly, faculty members have an obligation to avoid situations that may require them to evaluate, grade, or supervise students with whom they have or have had sexual and/or romantic relationships. If such a situation arises, a faculty member must report the situation immediately to their immediate supervisor upon becoming aware of such a situation.
Likewise, University personnel may not participate in evaluating or supervising any other employee with whom such personnel currently have or have had a sexual and/or romantic relationship. If such a situation arises, the supervisory employee must report it immediately to their immediate supervisor upon becoming aware of it.
Consent: Consent is defined as conduct that a reasonable person would understand to indicate agreement to the sexual conduct at issue. Under this policy, consent must be informed, freely given, and mutually understood. Lack of consent is a critical factor in determining whether sexual violence has occurred.
Under Alabama law, lack of consent for criminal purposes “results from either of the following: (1) forcible compulsion; or (2) being incapable of consent.” Ala. Code § 13A-6-70(b). “Forcible compulsion” means:
Use or threatened use, whether expressed or implied, of physical force, violence, confinement, restraint, physical injury, or death to the threatened person or to another person. Factors to be considered in determining an implied threat include, but are not limited to, the respective ages and sizes of the victim and the accused; the respective mental and physical conditions of the victim and the accused; the atmosphere and physical setting in which the incident was alleged to have taken place; the extent to which the accused may have been in a position of authority, domination, or custodial control over the victim; or whether the victim was under duress. Forcible compulsion does not require proof of resistance by the victim.
Ala. Code § 13A-6-60(1). Furthermore, under Alabama law, “[a] person is deemed incapable of consent if he or she is either: (1) less than 16 years old; or (2) incapacitated.” Ala.Code § 13A-6-70(c). A person is “incapacitated” if he or she is: (1) “suffer[ing] from a mental or developmental disease or disability which renders the person incapable of appraising the nature of his or her conduct;” (2) “temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling his or her conduct due to the influence of a narcotic, anesthetic, or intoxicating substance and the condition was known or should have been reasonably known to the offender,” or (3) “unable to give consent or…unable to communicate an unwillingness to an act because the person is unconscious, asleep, or…otherwise physically limited or unable to communicate.” Ala. Code § 13A-6-60(2).
In addition to Alabama law, the following are essential to understanding what constitutes effective consent under the policy:
-
- If coercion, intimidation, threats, and/or physical force are used, there is no consent.
- If a person is incapacitated by alcohol or drugs such that the person cannot understand the fact, nature, or extent of the sexual situation, there is no consent even if the person self-administered the alcohol or drugs.
- Consent to one form of sexual activity does not imply consent to other forms of sexual activity.
- Consent can be withdrawn by verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would understand to indicate a desire to stop or not engage in the sexual conduct at issue.
- While consent can be withdrawn, a withdrawal of consent operates going forward. It does not change the consensual nature of sexual activity that has already occurred.
- Being in a romantic relationship with someone does not imply consent to any form of sexual activity.
Dating Violence: Dating violence is violence committed by a person who is or has been in a “relationship of a romantic or intimate nature [with the complainant that is] characterized by the expectation of affectionate or sexual involvement by either party.” Ala. Code § 13A-6-130(a)(2). Alabama law does not specifically define dating violence, but conduct of this nature is covered by the definitions of dating relationship and domestic violence found in Alabama Code §§ 13A-6-130 -- 13A-6-132. Dating violence does not depend on the gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of the alleged victim and the alleged perpetrator. Thus, dating violence can occur between persons who consider themselves to be of the same gender/gender identity or a different gender/gender identity. Dating violence is a crime and is prohibited by this policy, no matter the motivation. Reports of domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking will be addressed under the Complaint Resolution Procedures.
Domestic Violence: Domestic violence is a felony or misdemeanor crime of violence committed by a current or former spouse, parent, step-parent, child, step-child, a person with whom the complainant shares a child, a present household member, or a person who has or had a dating or intimate relationship with the complainant.
Alabama law prohibits domestic violence under Alabama Code §13A-6-130 through 143. Domestic violence does not depend on the gender,
gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of the complainant and the alleged perpetrator. Thus, domestic violence can occur between persons who consider themselves to be of the same gender/gender identity or a different gender/gender identity.
Domestic violence is a crime and is prohibited by this policy, no matter the motivation. Reports of domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, and electronic stalking will be addressed under the Complaint Resolution Procedures.
Electronic Stalking: Electronic Stalking occurs when a person, without the consent of the owner or except as otherwise authorized by law, places any electronic tracking device on the property of another person, with or without the intent to surveil or for any other unlawful purpose. Alabama law prohibits electronic stalking under Alabama Code §13A-6-95 through § 13A-6-96.
Faculty: The term “faculty” includes full-time and part-time (i.e., those without a full-time staff appointment) University employees who teach or carry out research, including adjunct and clinical faculty, graduate teaching assistants, graduate research assistants, and administrators with faculty status.
Formal Complaint: A formal complaint is a document filed by a Complainant or signed by the Title IX Coordinator alleging sexual misconduct against a Respondent and requesting that the University investigate the allegation of sexual misconduct in accordance with this policy and related procedures. When filing a Formal Complaint, a Complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the University’s education programs and activities. A “document filed by the Complainant” means a document or electronic submission (such as an email) that contains the Complainant’s physical or electronic signature or otherwise indicates that the Complainant is the person filing the Formal Complaint.
Good Faith Reports: The University encourages the good faith reporting of sexual misconduct. However, the University will not allow this policy or the Complaint Resolution Procedures to be abused for improper means. Accordingly, the University may take disciplinary action against any person who makes a bad-faith report of sexual misconduct, and such disciplinary action will not constitute prohibited retaliation. A person makes a bad faith report of sexual misconduct if, at the time that they make the report, they know the report is false or frivolous and the person does not have a documented mental health disorder that is the direct cause, in the University’s reasonable discretion, of the false or frivolous allegations. Further, the University may take disciplinary action against any person who knowingly provides false information during the investigation or resolution of a sexual misconduct complaint, and such disciplinary action will not constitute prohibited retaliation.
Non-Faculty Employee: The term “Non-Faculty Employee” includes full and part-time staff employees, coaches, resident physicians, postdoctoral fellows, USAHCA physicians, and physicians without faculty appointments.
Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment: Quid pro quo sexual harassment occurs when an employee, agent, or other person authorized to provide aid, benefit, or service of the University under the University’s education program or activity conditions, explicitly or implicitly, the provision of aid, benefit, or service of the University on the individual’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct.
Reasonable Person: A reasonable person is one who exercises average care, skill, and judgment in their conduct and who serves as a comparative standard for determining responsibility.
Respondent: An individual who is alleged to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute sexual misconduct.
Retaliation: Retaliation is intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against any individual by the University, a student, an employee, or a person authorized by the University to provide aid, benefit, or service for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX and its implementing regulations or because an individual has made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this policy and related procedures. Examples of retaliation include:
-
- Termination of employment, demotion, denial of promotion, reduction in pay, or being “written up” because a report of sexual misconduct was made;
- Sending threatening text messages or social media messages to someone because of a report of sexual misconduct or because of a statement made as a witness;
- Causing physical damage to personal belongings because of a report of sexual misconduct or because of a statement made as a witness;
- Suspension from an activity or limiting involvement because of a report of sexual misconduct; or
- Publication of knowingly false information about a person because of a report of sexual misconduct.
Sex Discrimination: Sex discrimination occurs when persons are excluded from any activity on the basis of their sex—including employment. Sex discrimination includes materially adverse treatment or action based on a person’s sex assigned at birth, pregnancy status, parenting status, gender, gender expression or sexual identity, and/or failure to conform to stereotypical notions of masculinity and femininity (so-called “gender stereotyping”). Sex discrimination also includes conduct that meets the definitions of sexual harassment and sexual assault. Specific examples of conduct that may constitute sex discrimination include:
-
- Giving unequal pay, promotions, or other job benefits on the basis of gender;
- Allowing a person’s gender to influence the grade conferred in a class;
- Denying people access to a given degree or major because of their gender;
- Requiring a pregnant student to verify pregnancy-related absences with a doctor’s note when such verification is not required of students with other medical conditions;
- Unless exempt under Title IX, excluding a person from a University-sponsored group because the person has a gender identity different than the gender assigned to the person at birth; or
- Excluding a person from participation in a University-sponsored activity based on stereotypical notions of how a person of a given gender or sexual identity should look, speak, or act.
Sexual Assault: Sexual assault is any of the following conduct:
-
- Having carnal knowledge, or attempting to have carnal knowledge, of a person, without consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. There is “carnal knowledge” if there is the slightest penetration of the vagina or penis by the sex organ of the other person.
- Oral or anal sexual intercourse with another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.
- Using an object or instrument to unlawfully penetrate, however slightly, the genital or anal opening of the body of another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. An “object or instrument” is anything used by the offender other than the offender’s genitalia.
- The touching of the private body parts of another for purposes of sexual gratification, without consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.
- Sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by Alabama law.
- Sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent as defined by Alabama law.
Sexual Harassment/ Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment: Unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person access to the University’s education programs and activities.
In determining whether unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature rises to the level of creating a hostile environment, the University will consider the totality of circumstances, including, but not limited to, (1) the degree to which the conduct affected the Complainant’s ability to access the University’s education program or activity; (2) the type, frequency, and duration of the conduct; (3) the parties’ ages, roles within the University’s education program or activity, previous interactions, and other factors about each party that may be relevant to evaluating the effects of the conduct; (4) the location of the conduct and the context in which the conduct occurred; and (5) other sex-based harassment in the University’s education program or activity.
A person’s adverse subjective reaction to conduct is not sufficient, in and of itself, to establish the existence of a hostile environment.
Hostile environment sexual harassment can occur between individuals of the same gender/gender identity and individuals of different gender/gender identity.
Specific examples of unwelcome conduct that may constitute hostile environment sexual harassment if unwelcome include:
-
- Unreasonable pressure for a dating, romantic, or intimate relationship or sexual activity;
- Kissing, hugging, rubbing, or massaging;
- Sexual innuendos, jokes, humor, or gestures;
- Displaying sexual graffiti, pictures, videos, or posters;
- Using sexually explicit profanity;
- Asking about or telling about sexual fantasies, sexual preferences, or sexual activities;
- Leering or staring at someone in a sexual way, such as staring at a person’s breasts or groin;
- Calling a person derogatory epithets based on stereotypical notions of how a person of a given sex or sexual identity should look, speak, or act;
- Sending sexually explicit communications, including, but not limited to, emails, text messages, or social media posts;
- Commenting on a person’s appearance or dress in a sexual manner;
- Giving unwelcome personal gifts, such as lingerie, that suggest the desire for a sexual relationship;
- Disseminating sexual pictures or videos of another person without consent regardless of whether the pictures or videos were obtained with consent.
Sexual Harassment: A form of sex discrimination, including, but not limited to, Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment, Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Stalking, or Electronic Stalking.
Sexual Misconduct: Sexual misconduct is an umbrella term that includes Sex Discrimination and Sexual Harassment. Sexual misconduct does not depend on the gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of the complainant and alleged perpetrator. Thus, sexual misconduct can occur between persons who consider themselves to be of the same gender/gender identity or different genders/gender identities.
Stalking: Stalking means engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to (A) fear for their safety or the safety of others who may be targeted by virtue of their relationship with the person; or (B) suffer substantial emotional distress. Alabama law prohibits stalking, as set forth in Alabama Code § 13A-6-90 to 13A-6-94, inclusive.
For purposes of the definition of stalking in this policy:
-
- A “course of conduct” means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or other means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person or interferes with a person’s property;
- “Substantial emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling; and
- Stalking can occur between persons of different genders/gender identities or the same gender/gender identity.
4. Policy Guidelines
4.1 Introduction
This policy prohibits sexual misconduct regardless of gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of the complainant and the alleged perpetrator. The University’s prohibition on sexual misconduct extends to all aspects of its educational programs and activities, including, but not limited to, admissions, employment, academics, athletics, housing, and student services.
This policy applies to conduct that occurs (1) on the University’s premises, (2) during or at an official University program or activity (regardless of location), or (3) off University premises when such conduct could interfere with or limit a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational programs and activities.
The University’s jurisdiction over students begins when a student registers for classes or participates in orientation, whichever occurs sooner. The University’s jurisdiction over students covers conduct that occurs when a student is enrolled in classes and during regular academic breaks, as well as when the student is not enrolled in classes for a particular term but nonetheless maintains a continuing relationship with the University. The University’s jurisdiction remains in effect until a student’s degree has been officially conferred by the University or other separation from the University occurs.
The University’s jurisdiction over faculty and staff begins on the first day of employment and remains in effect until the faculty or staff member is no longer employed by the University.
4.1.1 Sexual Harassment, Freedom of Speech, and Academic Freedom:
While sexual harassment can include verbal and written conduct, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and University policies establishing academic freedom providers provide significant space for individuals to express controversial views, teach controversial subjects, and engage in controversial research. As such, the offensiveness of a particular expression, course content, subject of academic inquiry, or research topic, as perceived by some, standing alone, is insufficient to constitute a violation of this policy. The University will apply and construe this policy consistent with the legal rights of community members under the First Amendment and University policies governing academic freedom.
Faculty members and students should be aware that conduct occurring in the context of educational instruction may exceed the protections of free speech and academic freedom if it meets the definition of sexual misconduct and is not germane to the academic subject matter, lacks a pedagogical purpose, advances the personal interest of a faculty member or student without relating to the learning process or legitimate academic objectives, causes material adverse action against a person, reveals confidential information about a person, is defamatory or libelous, threatens physical harm or imminent violence, or constitutes some other category of speech that is unprotected by the U.S. Constitution.
Faculty members and students should be aware that conduct occurring in the context of educational instruction may exceed the protections of free speech and academic freedom if it meets the definition of sexual misconduct and is not germane to the academic subject matter, lacks a pedagogical purpose, advances the personal interest of a faculty member or student without relating to the learning process or legitimate academic objectives, causes material adverse action against a person, reveals confidential information about a person, is defamatory or libelous, threatens physical harm or imminent violence, or constitutes some other category of speech that is unprotected by the U.S. Constitution.
4.2 Reporting
4.2.1 Making a Report
4.2.1.1 Employees
Except for those Confidential Resources employees identified in Section 4.2.6, all University employees (including administrators, faculty, staff, and student employees) must report sexual misconduct that they observe or otherwise learn about. Absent extenuating circumstances, as determined in the University’s sole discretion, employees must make their report to the Title IX Coordinator, a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, or the University Police Department within three (3) calendar days of first becoming aware of the potential sexual misconduct. The University may take disciplinary action against an employee who fails to report sexual misconduct as required by this policy, up to and including termination.
4.2.1.2 Students and Non-Employee Members of the University Community
Students and non-employee (contractors, vendors, volunteers, camp participants, visitors, etc.) members of the University Community who wish to report sexual misconduct should file a report with the Title IX Coordinator, a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, and/or the University Police Department. Students and non-employee members of the University Community should be aware that all employees at the University, other than the Confidential Resources identified in Section 4.2.6 below, must report sexual misconduct that they observe or otherwise learn about.
At the time of filing a formal complaint, the complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the University’s educational program or activity.
4.2.1.3 Right to Make a Report to the U.S. Department of Education
In addition to the reporting options under this policy, any person may make a report of sexual misconduct to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights by visiting or by calling 1-800-421-3481.
4.2.2 Reporting to Law Enforcement
In addition to making a report under this policy, the University encourages anyone who believes they are the victim of a crime to make a report to law enforcement. The contact information for the University’s Police Department is:
èßäÊÓƵ Police Department
290 Stadium Blvd.
Beta Gamma Commons
Mobile, Alabama 36688-0001
Phone: (251) 460-6312
Tips Line: (251) 460-6667
If requested, the University will assist an individual in notifying the appropriate law enforcement authorities. If a person believes they are in imminent danger, they should dial 911. Unless there is a health or safety emergency, an articulable threat to members of the University Community, or a state law requiring reporting (such as in the case of child abuse), the University will not contact outside law enforcement without a potential complainant’s permission.
4.2.3 Special Advice for Individuals Reporting Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, or Dating Violence.
For those who believe that they are a victim of sexual assault, domestic violence, or dating violence, the University recommends the following:
-
-
- Get to a safe place as soon as possible;
- Try to preserve all physical evidence of the incident – avoid bathing, using the toilet, rinsing one’s mouth, or changing clothes. If it is necessary to change clothes, put all clothing that was worn at the time of the incident in a paper bag, not a plastic one;
- Contact University police by calling (251) 460-6312 if the incident occurred on campus or the local police by calling 911 if the incident happened off campus;
- Get medical attention – all medical injuries are not immediately apparent. It is also necessary to collect evidence if the individual decides to press charges. USA Children’s and Women’s Hospital (identified in Section 4.2.6 of this policy) has evidence collection kits necessary for criminal prosecution should the individual wish to pursue charges now or in the future;
- Contact a trusted person, such as a friend or family member, for support;
- Call the Assault Hotline at (251) 460-7151, 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. A trained Advocate will contact you to offer assistance;
- Talk with a counselor who will help explain options, give information, and provide emotional support;
- Make a report to the Title IX Coordinator or a Deputy Coordinator;
- Explore this policy and avenues for resolution under the Complaint Resolution Procedures.
-
It is also essential to take steps to preserve evidence in cases of stalking, to the extent such evidence exists. In cases of stalking, evidence is more likely to be in the form of letters, emails, text messages, etc., rather than evidence of physical contact and violence.
4.2.4 Limited Amnesty
The University recognizes that an individual who has been drinking alcohol or using drugs may be hesitant to report sexual misconduct arising from the same setting where the alcohol or drugs were consumed. To encourage reporting, the University will not take disciplinary action for drug or alcohol use against an individual who makes a good faith report of sexual misconduct, either as the reporter/complainant or as a witness, provided that these conduct violations did not and do not place the health or safety of any other person at risk.
The University’s commitment to amnesty in these situations does not prevent action by local police or other legal authorities against an individual who has illegally consumed alcohol or drugs.
4.2.5 Timing of Reports
Except for those Confidential Resources employees identified in Section 4.2.6, all University employees (including administrators, faculty, staff, and student employees) must report sexual misconduct that they observe or otherwise learn about.
Absent extenuating circumstances, as determined in the University’s sole discretion, employees must make their report to the Title IX Coordinator, a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, or the University Police Department within three (3) calendar days of first becoming aware of the potential sexual misconduct.
The University may take disciplinary action against an employee who fails to report sexual misconduct as required by this policy, up to and including termination.
4.2.6 Confidential Resources
The University has designated a limited number of employees as Confidential Resources. These Confidential Resources do not have a duty to report sexual misconduct to the Title IX Coordinator. They will not disclose identifying information provided to them in their professional capacities unless a specific law requires them to do so, such as laws requiring reporting child abuse. Confidential Resources have received training about the policy, will provide the contact information of the Title IX Coordinator, and will report sexual misconduct to the University or law enforcement voluntarily.
4.2.6.1 The University’s Confidential Resources are:
Professional Counselors at the Counseling and Wellness Center
300 Student Center Circle
Mobile, Alabama 36688-0001
Phone: (251) 460-7051
Trained Advocates on call 24/7 with the USA Title IX Support Advocate Program
Phone: (251) 753-5440
Medical providers at the Student Health Center (SANE exam provider)
5870 USA èßäÊÓƵ Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36688-0002
Phone: (251) 460-7151
Employee Assistance Counselor
(for employees only) Phone: (251) 461-1346
USA Children’s and Women’s Hospital (SANE exam provider)
1700 Center Street,
Mobile, Alabama 36604
Phone: (251) 415-1000
University Hospital
2451 University Hospital Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36617
Phone: (251) 471-7000
USA Health Providence Hospital
6801 Airport Boulevard
Mobile, Alabama 36608
Phone: (251) 633-1000
6801 Airport Boulevard
Mobile, Alabama 36608
Phone: (251) 633-1000
4.2.6.2 Community Resources:
In addition, there are several hospitals and support services in the greater Mobile region that can provide counseling and advice to individuals subjected to sexual misconduct. These entities will not disclose information that is provided to them without the individual’s consent unless a specific law requires them to do so. These third-party resources include:
Lifelines Counseling Services Rape Crisis
705 Oak Circle Drive, N.
Mobile, Alabama 36609
Phone: (251) 473-7273 or (800) 718-7273 (24 hours a day)
Penelope House
Family Violence Center
Confidential location
Phone: (251) 342-8994
Springhill Medical Center
3719 Dauphin Street
Mobile, Alabama 36608
Phone: (251) 344-9630
Infirmary Health
5 Mobile Infirmary Circle
Mobile, Alabama 36607
Tel: (252) 435-2400
4.3 Evaluation of the Report and Engagement with the Parties
4.3.1 Initial Evaluation of the Report
After the University receives a report of sexual misconduct, the Title IX Coordinator will conduct an initial evaluation of the report to determine whether the conduct alleged, if true, could reasonably constitute a violation of this policy.
If the conduct as alleged could not constitute a violation of the policy, the Title IX Coordinator may refer the report to be addressed under any other applicable University policy or close the matter without further investigation. However, the report will not be further addressed under this policy or the Complaint Resolution Procedures.
If the Title IX Coordinator determines that the alleged conduct could constitute a violation of this policy, the Title IX Coordinator will attempt to contact the potential complainant. If the reporting party is not also the potential complainant, the reporting party may have no further involvement in the process.
4.3.2 Contact with the Parties
The Title IX Coordinator and the Title IX Support Advocate will contact the potential complainant of the conduct reported. The Title IX Coordinator will advise the potential complainant of their options under the policy and otherwise, including:
-
-
- Voluntarily contacting parents or a relative;
- Seeking legal advice;
- Seeking personal counseling through the University’s counseling center;
- Contacting law enforcement with the University’s assistance;
- Requesting an investigation and making a formal complaint under the Complaint Resolution Procedures;
- Requesting that no further action be taken and that the potential complainant's identity not be disclosed; and/or
- Seeking interim measures, such as housing or academic assistance.
-
The Title IX Coordinator will give the potential complainant a written document that outlines these options and provides contact information for local resources and support organizations.
If a formal complaint is filed, the Title IX Coordinator will contact the respondent about the reported conduct and advise the respondent of the process and options under the policy. Pending the outcome of the process, there is a presumption that the respondent is not responsible for the reported conduct.
4.3.3 Support Measures
Support measures are temporary measures taken to ensure equal and continuing access to university programs and activities and the safety of the university community. They do not constitute a finding of guilt and may be removed if a report or complaint is not substantiated.
After receiving a report and during any investigation under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the Title IX Coordinator will impose any support measures necessary to protect the involved parties from further sexual misconduct, to separate the parties, to protect witnesses, and/or to support the parties pending resolution. These interim measures may include but are not limited to the provision of counseling or support services; reasonable changes in academic, living, transportation, or work arrangements; and/or entry of a mutual “no contact” order or similar order to ensure separation of the parties (and in some cases, non-parties). Either the complainant or the respondent may request support measures. Support measures may not unduly burden either party or non-parties. Any non-party issued a “no contact” order may make a written request to the Dean of Students at any time to have the order terminated. The decision of the Dean of Students is final.
In cases where an individualized risk assessment indicates there is reasonable cause to believe the respondent poses an imminent and serious threat to the health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of sexual misconduct, the University may issue a full or partial suspension, on an interim basis, until the matter is resolved through the Complaint Resolution Procedures.
A student suspended or trespassed on an interim basis shall be given a prompt opportunity to appear before the Dean of Students or their designee, and the University Behavioral Assessment Team in order to discuss only the reliability of the information concerning the student’s conduct, including the matter of his or her identity, or whether the conduct and surrounding circumstances reasonably indicate that the continued presence of the student on University premises poses a substantial and immediate threat. This opportunity should be offered within seventy-two (72) hours of the interim suspension/trespass being issued.
If a complainant or potential complainant has obtained an ex parte order of protection (i.e., a temporary order for shelter and protection against someone who is a danger to another person), a full order of protection, or any other temporary restraining order or no contact order against the alleged perpetrator from a criminal, civil, or tribal court, they should provide such information to the Title IX Coordinator so that the University can take all reasonable and legal action to implement the order concerning those persons and areas the University controls.
Support measures may be requested by any party at any time. Any person who believes support measures are being violated should report the alleged violation in the same manner as reporting sexual misconduct, as outlined in Section 4.2.
4.3.4 Decision on How to Proceed
If a formal complaint is filed under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the Title IX Coordinator will appoint an Investigator, and the complaint will be investigated and resolved per the Complaint Resolution Procedures. The University will make all reasonable and appropriate efforts to preserve the potential complainant’s privacy and conduct any investigation and resolution with discretion. However, the University cannot guarantee complete confidentiality due to state and federal laws governing the reporting of certain types of misconduct and the necessity for information to be disclosed to the respondent and others involved in the investigation.
If the complainant wishes to pursue a formal complaint under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the potential complainant must reduce the complaint to writing or describe the complaint so that the Title IX Coordinator can document it in writing. The written complaint shall include the following:
-
-
- The name of the complainant;
- The name of the respondent;
- The details of the alleged sexual misconduct;
- The names of any persons believed by the complainant to have relevant information; and
- Any other information the complainant believes is pertinent to the alleged sexual misconduct.
-
The written complaint will be provided to the Title IX Investigator (the "TIX Investigator"), as specified in the Complaint Resolution Procedures. If the potential complainant requests that the report not be investigated and/or is unwilling to make a formal complaint under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the University will take all reasonable steps to address the report in a manner consistent with the request. However, the University’s ability to address the reported misconduct may be limited.
The University reserves the right to initiate or continue proceedings under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, despite the potential complainant’s wishes to the contrary, when, considering the totality of circumstances, the University determines that not initiating proceedings would be unreasonable. This may occur when a report involves serious or repeated conduct or where the alleged perpetrator may pose a continuing threat to the University Community. In such a case, the Title IX Coordinator may sign a formal complaint to initiate proceedings against a respondent.
If a complainant initiates a formal complaint under the Complaint Resolution Procedures but then elects to withdraw it, the University may also proceed with resolving the formal complaint at its discretion depending upon the facts and circumstances of the incident. Additionally, the University may consolidate multiple formal complaints involving different persons arising from the same facts or circumstances.
If the University initiates a formal complaint or continues proceedings under the Complaint Resolution Procedures contrary to the potential complainant’s wishes, the University must treat the non-participating complainant as a party and notify them throughout the complaint resolution process. This requirement is intended to preserve the non-participating complainant’s right to choose to participate, not to pressure the non-participating complainant into participating.
The University may dismiss a formal complaint at any time if the complainant would like to withdraw it, the respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the University; or specific circumstances prevent the University from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination.
4.4 Investigation and Resolution
4.4.1 Complaint Resolution Procedures
All formal complaints of sexual misconduct will be investigated and resolved under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, which, along with this policy, are the exclusive means of resolving formal complaints of sexual misconduct. However, if a formal complaint is dismissed, the University may refer the matter for resolution under other policies or procedures, where permitted by law. To the extent this policy and/or the Complaint Resolution Procedures conflict with any other University policy, this policy, and/or the Complaint Resolution Procedures, as the case may be, will control the investigation. Under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the party making a formal complaint is referred to as the “complainant,” and the person accused of misconduct is referred to as the “respondent.”
4.4.2 Support Persons
At each stage of the Complaint Resolution Procedures (interviews, meetings, hearings, etc.), a support person may accompany the complainant and respondent. The support person’s role is to provide support and private counsel to the party. The support person is expected to be discreet with the information they receive during the process, and they will not be permitted to attend, present information, argue, or actively participate in the proceedings unless the support person has also been designated as a party’s advisor. The University reserves the right to dismiss a support person who fails to follow this policy and applicable provisions of the Complaint Resolution Procedures, in which case the party will be allowed to select a different support person.
The University’s Advocate Program offers trained Support Advocates who are available to serve as support persons for complainants. The Advocates have received in-depth training regarding this policy and the Conflict Resolution Procedure and can provide support and assistance in understanding and navigating the process. Any complainant wishing to utilize a Support Advocate should request with the Title IX Coordinator.
Similarly, the University has a pool of trained support persons, referred to as Respondent Resources, who can serve as support persons for respondents. These Respondent Resources have received in-depth training regarding this policy and the Complaint Resolution Procedures and can assist a respondent in understanding and navigating this policy and the Complaint Resolution Procedures. A respondent wishing to utilize a Respondent Resource should make a request with the Title IX Coordinator.
Each party is also entitled to an advisor of their choice to conduct a cross-examination for the party during the hearing. An advisor does not have to be but maybe, an attorney. If a party does not have an advisor, the University will provide one free of charge. A support person may also serve as an advisor, either by choice of the party or by designation of the University.
4.4.3 General Principles Applicable to the Investigation and Resolution Process
In conducting its investigation and resolution under the Complaint Resolution Procedures, the University will:
-
-
- Make reasonable and appropriate efforts to preserve the privacy of the parties involved while recognizing that absolute confidentiality is not possible;
- Provide equal information to all parties about the investigation and resolution process;
- Conduct a thorough, fair, and impartial investigation that provides the parties an equal opportunity to present information and equivalent procedural safeguards;
- Allow all parties to be accompanied to the hearing (if applicable) by an advisor of their choice;
- Keep the parties apprised of the progress of the investigation and anticipated time to resolution;
- Provide the parties an equal opportunity to meet with the TIX Investigator and to be present and testify (if applicable) at any hearing required by the Complaint Resolution Procedures, though not during the deliberative process;
- Provide the parties an equal opportunity to comment on the information developed during the investigation;
- Complete various phases of the process in a reasonably prompt time frame, and in the event of any delays, which may only be for good cause, provide written notice to the parties;
- Avoid conflicts of interest that could call into question the integrity of the process;
- Provide simultaneous written notice to the parties of the outcome of a formal complaint and the outcome of any appeal and
- If a formal complaint of sexual misconduct is substantiated, take appropriate corrective, disciplinary, and remedial action intended to prevent the recurrence of the conduct and correct its discriminatory effects.
-
At any point during the investigation, if the University determines that the conduct alleged in the formal complaint is assumed true:
-
-
- Does not constitute sexual harassment;
- Did not occur in the University's education program or activity; or
- Did not occur against a person in the United States;
-
then the University must dismiss the complaint for purposes of this policy.
The University has the discretion to address such conduct under another policy, such as a student code of conduct, faculty handbook, or staff employee handbook.
4.4.4 Sharing of Information
As a general rule, the University will share information about a report or formal complaint and information received during any investigation only with those persons who have a need to know and those whose participation is necessary to ensure a full and fair investigation and resolution under this policy and the Complaint Resolution Procedures. However, once a report is made to anyone other than a Confidential Resource, absolute confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. Further, while the outcome of a particular complaint and any related discipline and remedial steps will generally be shared only with the parties, the University reserves the right to share the outcome of a particular complaint more broadly, to the extent such disclosure is permitted by applicable laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, as amended by the Campus Save Act.
4.5 Education
Because the University recognizes that the prevention of sexual misconduct is important, all employees are required to complete annual Title IX training on sexual misconduct and timely notification through the Title IX Office. The University will take disciplinary action against an employee who fails to complete this annual training as required by this policy, up to and including termination.
The Title IX Office will also offer a variety of educational programming, including primary prevention and awareness training for students and ongoing awareness programs for all members of the University Community.
Information on specific education programs and training is available from the Title IX Coordinator and is published on the Title IX website: /departments/studentaffairs/titlenine/. Education materials and information regarding upcoming workshops and training can be requested via email at titleix@southalabama.edu.
4.6 Policy Review
This policy is maintained by the University’s Title IX Coordinator. The Title IX Coordinator will review this policy annually, with the assistance of the University’s Title IX Executive Committee. The review will capture evolving legal requirements, evaluate the support and resources available to the parties, and assess the effectiveness of the Complaint Resolution Procedures. The review will incorporate an aggregate view of reports, resolution, and climate.
4.7 Distribution
This policy will be disseminated widely to the University Community through email communication, the University’s website, inclusion in orientation programs for new employees and new students, and other appropriate channels of communication.
5. Procedures
5.1 General Principles
5.1.1 Applicability
These Complaint Resolution Procedures apply to the resolution of all formal complaints under the Sexual Misconduct Policy. They apply to the resolution of formal complaints against all members of the University Community, and they are the exclusive means of resolving formal complaints of sexual misconduct.
For employees: Consequences for employees found in violation of University policy, based on the clear and convincing standard, can range from a written warning to suspension up to termination of employment.
5.1.2 Definitions
“TIX Investigator” means the individual(s) designated by the Title IX Coordinator to investigate a particular formal complaint and administer relevant provisions of these Complaint Resolution Procedures. The TIX Investigator may consult with other University administrators and counsel as needed. The TIX Investigator may be a third-party investigator or attorney retained for that purpose by the University. The TIX Investigator will also be trained on issues of relevance to creating an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence. The training is free of sex stereotypes and promotes impartial investigations.
5.1.3 Promptness, Fairness, and Impartiality
These procedures provide for prompt, fair, and impartial investigations and resolutions. All University employees involved in the investigation and resolution process shall discharge their obligations under these Complaint Resolution Procedures fairly and impartially. If an involved University employee is unable to apply these procedures fairly and impartially because of the identity of a complainant, respondent, or witness, or due to any other conflict of interest, another suitable individual will be designated by the Title IX Coordinator or the Associate Title IX Coordinator to fill the role.
5.1.4 Training
These procedures will be implemented by University employees who receive training on issues related to sexual misconduct. The Title IX
Coordinator, Deputy Title IX Coordinators, TIX Investigator (s), Title IX Specialist, Decision-Maker(s), Advisors, Support Advocates, Respondent Resources, and the University Disciplinary Committee (UDC) have all been trained on the various relevant aspects of the University’s Sexual Misconduct Policy and Complaint Resolution Procedures.
The training includes conducting investigations, hearings, appeals, and informal resolutions, as well as serving impartially, including avoiding prejudgment of the facts at issue and conflicts of interest and bias. The training is free of sex stereotypes and promotes impartial investigations.
Additionally, decision-makers receive training on relevant technology used at any live hearing, relevance, and the permissible use of sexual history during a live hearing.
5.1.5 Participation in Investigations
All members of the University Community are encouraged and expected to fully cooperate with any investigation and resolution under this Complaint Resolution Procedure. If a complainant refuses to participate under these Complaint Resolution Procedures, the Title IX Coordinator may sign a formal complaint to initiate proceedings against a respondent under the circumstances specified in Section 4.3.4 of this policy. If a respondent refuses to participate, the Complaint Resolution Procedures will be completed despite the respondent’s lack of participation and may result in a finding of misconduct in absentia.
5.1.6 Virtual Process
To the extent that the parties are conducting meetings, the University can accommodate virtual processes with consent from all parties. At the request of any party, any hearing (if applicable) may be held via virtual platforms, provided that the virtual platform enables the decisionmaker and parties to simultaneously see and hear the party or witness that while that person is speaking.
5.2 Timing, Notification, and Initiation of Process
5.2.1 Timing of Investigation and Resolution
The University will endeavor to conclude its investigation and resolution of the formal complaint promptly. The complainant (including a complainant who elected not to proceed with filing a formal complaint and a complainant who filed a formal complaint and subsequently withdrew) and the respondent will be given periodic updates regarding the status of the investigation. If the complainant or respondent needs additional time to prepare or gather their witnesses or information, they shall notify the TIX Investigator in writing, explaining how much additional time is needed and why it is needed. The TIX Investigator shall respond to any such request promptly.
Some instances of sexual misconduct may also constitute criminal conduct. If alleged criminal conduct has also been reported to law enforcement, the University may temporarily delay its investigation of the complaint where necessary to avoid interfering with law enforcement.
However, the pendency of a criminal investigation does not serve as a substitute for these procedures, and the investigation and resolution process will commence promptly once, in the University’s sole discretion, interference is no longer a concern. In addition, because the University’s process is separate and distinct from any criminal prosecution, the University’s determination will not be held in abeyance due to the pendency of a criminal trial.
5.2.2 Complaints Involving Multiple Parties
In most cases, a formal complaint will involve a single complainant and a single respondent. To the extent multiple complainants are making formal complaints against a single respondent, or a single complainant is making formal complaints against multiple respondents, each formal complaint will be addressed separately under this Complaint Resolution Procedure unless the formal complaints arise from the same transaction of facts.
To the extent multiple formal complaints arise from the same transaction of facts, the TIX Investigator, in consultation with the Title IX Coordinator may merge the formal complaints into a single investigation and resolution process.
Similarly, where the respondent makes a reciprocal allegation of sexual misconduct or where the complainant later makes additional allegations that relate to the original formal complaint, the TIX Investigator, in consultation with the Title IX Coordinator may combine all related and relevant allegations of sexual misconduct into one investigation and resolution process.
5.2.3 Notification of the Respondent and Selection of Process
Once a formal complaint is received by the Title IX Coordinator the Title IX Coordinator will notify the respondent, assign a Respondent Resource to the case, and provide the respondent with the opportunity to review a copy of the written formal complaint, and provide resources and support measures if needed.
Additionally, the TIX Investigator will provide written notice to both parties that contains:
-
-
- The University’s process for resolving the formal complaint, including the informal resolution process;
- The specific allegations of sexual misconduct, including sufficient details known at the time to allow the parties to prepare a response before any initial interview by the TIX Investigator, which includes, but are not limited to, the identity of the parties involved, the conduct allegedly constituting sexual misconduct, and the date and location of the alleged incident, if known;
- A statement that the respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct and that a determination regarding responsibility is made after the grievance process;
- Prior to any determination of responsibility, the parties will have an opportunity to present relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence to a trained, impartial decision-maker;
- Each party may have an advisor of their choice who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney;
- All parties are entitled to an equal opportunity to access the relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence or an investigative report that accurately summarizes the evidence, and if the University provides access to an investigative report, each party is entitled to an equal opportunity to access to the relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence upon request; and
- All parties may inspect and review evidence; and
- Any provisions in the University’s student code of conduct, or applicable faculty or staff handbook, that prohibit knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process.
-
The TIX Investigator will then communicate with each party separately to discuss the pertinent avenues for resolution as set forth below. If the parties provide written consent to informal resolution, the TIX Investigator, in consultation with the Title IX Coordinator, will determine whether informal resolution is an appropriate means to resolve the formal complaint, instead of the formal process. The TIX Investigator will then notify the parties of the specific informal resolution process to be used. If any students are parties, the Title IX Coordinator shall also be notified.
If the scope of the investigation expands, the University will issue a supplemental written notice providing additional details to all parties.
5.3 Informal Resolution
5.3.1 Nature of Informal Resolution
Informal resolution is a process by which the Title IX Coordinator or TIX Investigator, working alone or in concert with other appropriate University administrators (such as a supervisor if the parties are employees), attempts to resolve a formal complaint to the mutual satisfaction of all parties. Informal resolution may include, but is not limited to, mediation, agreed separation of the parties, referral of the parties to their respective counseling programs, agreed upon educational or training programs for one or more of the parties, and the agreement of a party to apologize for their conduct. Other agreed remedial measures may include agreed-upon forms of discipline.
Although informal resolution may involve some investigation by the TIX Investigator to understand the background of the complaint, informal resolution is not intended to reach a formal determination as to whether or not sexual misconduct occurred, unless the respondent admits to the conduct at issue.
5.3.2 When Informal Resolution May Be Used
Informal resolution is intended to resolve complaints quickly and collaboratively. However, the Title IX Coordinator may determine that informal resolution is not appropriate in certain circumstances, such as where informal resolution has failed between the same parties in the past, where the resolution sought by one party is of a type that cannot be achieved through informal resolution, where the conduct is particularly serious, or where the respondent is accused of a pattern of misconduct.
All parties must agree in writing to use informal resolution. If any party does not wish to use informal resolution, formal resolution will be used. Any party has the right to end an informal resolution at any time before forming an agreement on a resolution and insisting upon a formal resolution. Similarly, the Title IX Coordinator has the discretion to convert the matter to a formal resolution, irrespective of the parties’ wishes. Informal resolution will generally not be utilized in any case in which an employee is accused of sexual misconduct involving a student, provided that the Title IX Coordinator shall retain authority to allow such cases to utilize informal resolution when the nature and severity of the allegations, in the Title IX Coordinator’s sole discretion, so warrant.
Before initiation of informal resolution, the University must provide notice to the parties that explain the following:
-
-
- The allegations;
- The requirements of the informal resolution process;
- That, prior to agreeing to a resolution, any party has the right to withdraw from the informal resolution process and to initiate or resume the University’s grievance procedures;
- That the parties’ agreement to a resolution at the conclusion of the informal resolution process precludes the parties from initiating or resuming grievance procedures arising from the same allegations;
- The potential terms that may be requested or offered in an informal resolution agreement, including notice that an informal resolution agreement is binding only on the parties; and
- What information the University will maintain and whether and how the University could disclose such information for use in further grievance procedures if grievance procedures are initiated or resumed.
-
5.3.3 Documentation of Informal Resolution
If the parties reach an agreement on an informal resolution, the TIX Investigator will consult with the Title IX Coordinator and other appropriate University administrators. This group will review the resolution and may reject it, approve it, or require modifications before approval. If the resolution is approved, the Title IX Coordinator or TIX Investigator will prepare a written memorandum setting forth the terms of the resolution. The Title IX Coordinator or TIX Investigator will present the written memorandum to the parties for their review and signature. Both parties will be provided with a simultaneous written notification that the case has been resolved under informal resolution. The Title IX Coordinator may transmit a copy of the written memorandum to other University administrators or employees whose involvement is necessary to effectuate the resolution and/or for inclusion in appropriate personnel files.
5.3.4 Monitoring of Implementation
Because it is collaborative and must be agreed to by all parties, there is no right to appeal the terms of an informal resolution. If the terms of an informal resolution require future action or inaction, the Title IX Coordinator may monitor the implementation of the informal resolution and maintain jurisdiction over a particular complaint until the terms of the informal resolution are satisfied. If the terms of the informal resolution are not satisfied, the Title IX Coordinator may reactivate the formal complaint and immediately commence its resolution under the formal process.
5.4 Formal Resolution
5.4.1 Nature of Formal Resolution
Formal resolution is a process by which a formal determination is made as to whether sexual misconduct occurred. If a finding is made that sexual misconduct occurred, the formal resolution will also result in a decision regarding disciplinary action to be taken against the perpetrator, as well as remedial measures that may be necessary to remedy the effect of the sexual misconduct on the complainant. Unlike informal resolution, formal resolution involves an in-depth investigation and determination of facts under a clear and convincing evidence standard. The formal resolution process varies depending on whether the alleged perpetrator is a student, faculty member, or non-faculty employee/other member of the University Community.
5.4.2 Rules of Evidence
Formal rules of evidence do not apply in any of the formal resolution processes specified below. Nonetheless, the information presented that is irrelevant or whose prejudicial effect substantially outweighs its probative value may be excluded from consideration. A complainant’s irrelevant sexual history will be excluded from consideration.
5.4.3 Time Frames
The University will endeavor to conduct the formal resolution process within a reasonable time frame. However, the time that it takes to complete the process will be affected by circumstances such as the availability of parties or witnesses, scheduling conflicts, intervening breaks, prior attempts at informal resolution, the complexity of a case, and the need to avoid interference with a pending law enforcement investigation. The parties will receive written notification if extenuating circumstances are anticipated to result in lengthy delays.
5.5 Formal Resolution Processes
5.5.1 Investigator
Complaints under this process will be investigated by the TIX Investigator unless the TIX Investigator is the respondent, in which case the investigator will be appointed by the Title IX Coordinator.
5.5.2 Investigation
Once the case is identified for formal resolution, the TIX Investigator will investigate to gather information and statements from witnesses and other sources for eventual review and consideration at a hearing.
The investigation will involve interviews with the complainant, respondent, and witnesses and the collection of non-testimonial information and/or materials, such as emails, text messages, security camera footage, and the like. Witnesses and information and/or materials may be identified and/or submitted by the parties or independently gathered by the TIX Investigator. Both parties will have equal opportunity to present witnesses, including fact and expert witnesses, and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. The TIX Investigator may decline to interview witnesses or collect information that the TIX Investigator deems irrelevant. The scope of the investigation shall be at the discretion of the TIX Investigator.
Before completion of the investigative report, the TIX Investigator will send to each party and the party’s advisor the evidence collected for review in an electronic format or a hard copy. The parties shall have ten (10) days to submit a written response to the TIX Investigator, which the TIX Investigator will consider before completion of the investigative report. Throughout the investigation, the parties will have those rights specified in Section 4.4 of this policy.
The TIX Investigator will complete the investigation report. Before any hearing, the TIX Investigator will submit the investigation report and any appended information to the Title IX Coordinator, for review. At least ten (10) business days before the hearing, the TIX Investigator shall send to each party, the party’s advisor, and the appropriate University administrator the investigative report in an electronic format or a hard copy for their review.
5.5.3 Hearing Committee
Complaints are assigned to committees for adjudication based on the relationship of the respondent to the University.
5.5.3.1 University Disciplinary Committee
The University Disciplinary Committee (UDC) shall adjudicate complaints proceeding to a hearing against any University student, including graduate students and College of Medicine students. The UDC consists of two to five students and two to four faculty or staff/administrators and is chaired by a designee of the Dean of Students. The Student Conduct Administrator (SCA) will preside over the hearing as the Hearing Officer/Decision-maker. In complaints involving a respondent who is a College of Medicine student or a graduate student, one member of the UDC must be a College of Medicine student or graduate student, respectively.
5.5.3.2 Sexual Harassment and Sexual Violence Resolution Committee
The Sexual Harassment and Sexual Violence Resolution Committee (SHSVRC) will be appointed by the President of the University and shall adjudicate complaints proceeding to a hearing against any University faculty member. The SHSVRC consists of three (3) members from departments other than those of the respondent: (1) a department chair; (2) a tenured member of the faculty or the rank of professor or associate professor; and (3) the Vice President for Student Affairs or Dean of Students, or a designee of the same, if the complainant is a student; if the complainant is not a student, another faculty member meeting the above description will be appointed to the SHSVRC. A chair will be selected by the SHSVRC.
5.5.3.3 Human Resources Hearing Committee
The Human Resources Hearing Committee (HRHC) shall adjudicate complaints proceeding to a hearing against any University administrator, non-faculty employee, contractor, or third party. If the respondent is employed by the General Division (Campus) the HRHC will consist of the Sr. Director Benefits, EEO/Employee Relations, the Associate VP, Finance & Administration/CHRO, and the respondent’s department head. If the respondent is employed in the USA Health system (including, but not limited to, USAHCA and USAHCM), the HRHC will consist of the Director, HS Employee Relations, a USA Health administrator, and the respondent’s department head. The HRHC will select a chair If any of the individuals in the above-named positions are unable to serve on the HRHC, he or she may designate a properly trained designee to serve in his or her place.
5.5.4 Waiver of Right to Hearing
After the investigation, the respondent may accept responsibility for the sexual misconduct and waive the right to a hearing. If the respondent accepts responsibility and waives the right to a hearing, appropriate discipline shall be determined, in consultation with University administrators, by the SCA, SHSVRC, and or HRHC, as the case may be, who will then provide simultaneous written notification of the same to the parties. Either party who disagrees with the discipline imposed has the right to appeal pursuant to Section 5.1.7.
5.5.5 Hearing
In the event the respondent does not accept responsibility after the investigation, the case shall proceed to a hearing. The hearing shall be administered by the hearing officer who is not a member of the committee adjudicating the complaint. The procedures for the hearing are as follows:
-
-
- The parties will have a pre-hearing meeting with the hearing officer and Title IX Coordinator to receive an explanation of the hearing process and answers to questions about the process, to discuss options for participation in the hearing, and to coordinate possible hearing dates;
- The parties will receive written notice from the hearing officer of the scheduled hearing at least ten (10) business days in advance unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties;
- The parties are expected to provide all relevant information and/or materials to the TIX Investigator during the investigation and are expected to immediately deliver any relevant information discovered after the investigation to the TIX Investigator for delivery to all relevant parties;
- At least ten (10) business days before the hearing, the Title IX Investigator shall send to each party, the party’s advisor, Title IX Coordinator, and the hearing officer the investigation report in an electronic format or a hard copy, for their review. The hearing officer shall send a copy of the investigation report to the members of the adjudicating committee;
- During the hearing, to the extent any party so requests, the parties will be separated by a divider or curtain or placed in separate rooms with the use of technology, or another similar arrangement, provided that arrangements will be made so that the parties can simultaneously see and hear the party or the witness answering questions;
- The Title IX Coordinator may attend the hearing but will have no formal role;
- Each party’s advisor may ask any other party or witnesses all relevant and follow-up questions, including those bearing on credibility, provided any such questioning or cross-examination is conducted directly, orally, and in real-time;
- No one other than a party’s advisor or a member of the adjudicating committee may direct questions to parties or witnesses.
- All parties and witnesses are expected to cooperate and provide truthful information;
- At the close of the hearing, the adjudicating committee will retire for deliberation. During deliberation, the adjudicating committee shall apply a clear and convincing standard to determine what conduct occurred and whether such conduct constitutes sexual misconduct;
- The University must make an audio or video recording of the hearing, or a transcript, but not of the deliberations, and make it available to the parties for inspection and review;
- The adjudicating committee will issue a written decision of finding(s) determined by the majority, under a clear and convincing standard. The written decision will include an identification of the allegations at issue, a description of the procedural steps taken throughout the case, findings of fact supporting the determination, conclusions regarding the application of the Sexual Misconduct Policy, a statement and rationale as to the determination for each allegation, a statement of any disciplinary sanctions and whether any remedies will be provided to the complainant, and a description of the procedures and permissible grounds for appeal;
- The SCA will, within five (5) business days of receiving the adjudicating committee’s written decision, provide written notification to the Title IX Coordinator and provide simultaneous written notification to the parties of the adjudicating committee’s written decision;
- The Title IX Coordinator shall separately notify the complainant, in writing, of any non-disciplinary remedial measures that will be offered for the complainant’s benefit;
- After the hearing process specified by these Complaint Resolution Procedures, including the determination of all appeals provided for hereunder or the expiration of any appeal deadlines without an appeal being filed, each party and its advisor shall return to the TIX Investigator or destroy/delete the investigative report and all appended information. Failure to do so by a party or their adviser may be punishable under the Student Code of Conduct, Faculty Handbook, and/or Staff and Employee Handbook, as applicable.
-
5.5.6 Sanctions
If the adjudicating committee finds the respondent responsible for violating this policy, or if the respondent accepts responsibility and waives his or her right to a hearing, appropriate discipline shall be determined, in consultation with University administrators, by the SCA, SHSVRC, or HRHC, as the case may be, who will then provide simultaneous written notification of the same to the parties. Sanctions may range from remedial education and training to removal from the University Community (i.e., dismissal or termination of employment), or any combination of the same.
5.5.6.1 Faculty
If the SHSVRC recommends termination as a sanction, the recommendation will be referred to the Office of Academic Affairs for handling through the appropriate process as outlined by the Faculty Handbook.
5.5.7 Appeal of the Adjudicating Committee’s Written Determination
Each party has the right to appeal the written determination of the adjudicating committee on the grounds set forth below.
The grounds for appeal are limited to the following:
-
-
- Material and prejudicial violation of procedural rights that affected the outcome of the hearing;
- New information, not reasonably available at the time of the hearing, that affected the outcome;
- The discipline imposed is too severe or too lenient; and/or
- Conflict of interest or bias by the Title IX Coordinator, TIX Investigator, or other decision-makers that affected the outcome.
-
To appeal, the aggrieved party must submit a written statement of appeal within five (5) business days of being notified of the outcome of the hearing to the appropriate University official designated below. The written statement must include the grounds for appeal and describe the basis for it in detail. In the event the written statement of appeal fails to state a permissible ground for appeal and/or does not describe the basis for the appeal, the appeal may be summarily dismissed.
5.5.7.1 Appeals from Complaints Against Students
Appeals from complaints against students must be directed to the Dean of Students. Within three (3) business days of receiving a valid appeal, the Dean of Students, or a designee, will provide a copy of the written statement of appeal to the other party. Thereafter, the party so notified will have five (5) business days to submit a written response to the appeal.
The Dean of Students, or a designee, shall deliver simultaneous written notification of the outcome of the appeal and the rationale for the result to the parties within ten (10) business days after the deadline for submission of any written response to the appeal. The written determination becomes final upon the earlier of when: (i) the parties are notified of the determination on appeal; or (ii) the time to file an appeal has passed with neither party appealing.
The decision of the Dean of Students is final.
5.5.7.2 Appeals from Complaints Against Faculty.
5.5.7.2.1 Faculty with USA Health.
Appeals from complaints against such faculty must be directed to the Vice President for Medical Affairs, Dean of the College of Medicine. Within three (3) business days of receiving a valid appeal, the Vice President for Medical Affairs, Dean of the College of Medicine, or a designee, will provide a copy of the written statement of appeal to the other party. Thereafter, the party so notified will have five (5) business days to submit a written response to the appeal. The Vice President for Medical Affairs, Dean of the College of Medicine, or a designee, shall deliver simultaneous written notification of the outcome of the appeal and the rationale for the result to the parties within ten(10) business days after the deadline for submission of any written response to the appeal. The written determination becomes final upon the earlier of when: (i) the parties are notified of the determination on appeal, or (ii) the time to file an appeal has passed with neither party appealing.
The decision of the Vice President for Medical Affairs, Dean of the College of Medicine, is final.
5.5.7.2.2 Faculty with the University – General Division.
Appeals from complaints against such faculty must be directed to the Provost. Within three (3) business days of receiving a valid appeal, the Provost, or a designee, will provide a copy of the written statement of appeal to the other party. Thereafter, the party so notified will have five (5) business days to submit a written response to the appeal. The Provost, or a designee, shall deliver simultaneous written notification of the outcome of the appeal and the rationale for the result to the parties within ten (10) business days after the deadline for submission of any written response to the appeal. The written determination becomes final upon the earlier of when: (i) the parties are notified of the determination on appeal, or (ii) the time to file an appeal has passed with neither party appealing.
The decision of the Provost is final.
5.5.7.3 Appeals from Complaints Against Administrators, Non-Faculty Employees, Contractors, and Third Parties
Appeals from complaints against administrators, non-faculty employees, contractors, and third parties must be directed to the Chief Administration Officer. Upon receipt, the Chief Administration Officer shall notify the President, who will constitute the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee within three (3) business days of his receipt of the notice. The Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee shall be a three-member panel designated by the President for the specific case appealed. No member of the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee shall be from the same division as the complainant or respondent or will have previously been involved with the case for which they are appointed.
The Chief Administrative Officer will provide the written statement of appeal to the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee within five (5) business days of its formation. The Chief Administrative Officer will also send a copy of the written statement of appeal to the non-appealing party, who will have five (5) business days to submit a written response to the appeal to the Chief Administrative Officer, who will promptly provide the written response to the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee.
After receipt of the written response by the non-appealing party (or the passing of the deadline for receipt of such response), the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee shall convene to review the written statement of appeal, any response, the investigation report (including its appendices), and the written determination of the HRHC. Within ten (10) business days of receiving the written response from the non-appealing party (or from the time for filing a written response expires if no response is submitted), the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee will provide simultaneous written notification to the parties of the outcome of the appeal and the rationale for the result. The written determination becomes final when: (i) the parties are notified of the determination on appeal, or (ii) the time to file an appeal has passed with neither party appealing.
The decision of the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee is final.
5.5.8 Violations of Other University Policies by Employees.
The adjudicating committee may determine that a violation of this policy did not occur (or was not proven to the required evidentiary standard) but that the behavior that occurred was unacceptable in the employment context. If the adjudicating committee makes such a finding, the respondent shall be referred to as set forth below for proceedings or additional action as warranted by this or any other University policy, which may result in remediation or disciplinary action up to and including termination.
5.5.8.1 Violations by Faculty with USA Health.
Any referrals of faculty with USA Health under Section 5.5.8 shall be directed to the Office of Academic Affairs for a determination regarding the discipline of the respondent. The University will provide written notification to the parties of the outcome of any matter referred to the Office of Academic Affairs, but the complainant will only be notified of sanctions that directly relate to the complainant. The University shall separately notify the complainant, in writing, of any non-disciplinary remedial measures that will be offered for the complainant’s benefit. Unless specifically required by law, neither the complainant, respondent, nor any witness will be allowed to review or appeal the Office of Academic Affairs’ written determination.
5.5.8.2 Violations by Administrators or Non-Faculty Employees.
Any referrals of administrators or non-faculty employees under Section 5.5.8 shall be directed to the Associate VP, Finance & Administration/CHRO for General Division Employees (Campus) and to the USA Health Chief Human Resources Officer for USA Health Employees. The CHRO will decide regarding the discipline of the respondent and any necessary remedial steps to be taken for the complainant. The CHRO will provide written notification to the parties of the outcome of any matter referred to the CHRO, but the complainant will only be notified of sanctions that directly relate to the complainant. The CHRO shall separately notify the complainant, in writing, of any non-disciplinary remedial measures offered for the complainant’s benefit. Unless specifically required by law, neither the complainant, respondent, nor any witness will be allowed to review or appeal the written determination of the CHRO.
5.5.9 Records
All official records created during the formal resolution of a complaint shall be maintained by the University for a period of seven years, including informal resolution records.
5.5.9.1 Complaints Against Students and Faculty
Records relating to complaints against students shall be maintained by the Title IX Office and Deputy Title IX Coordinator for Academic Affairs.
5.5.9.2 Complaints Against Faculty with USA Health.
Records relating to complaints against faculty with USA Health shall be maintained by the Title IX Coordinator for USA Health. Where such a faculty member is found to have engaged in sexual misconduct, a letter will be placed in the faculty member’s personnel file indicating that the Title IX Coordinator for USA Health maintains records of the sexual misconduct complaint.
5.5.9.3 Complaints Against Administrators, Non-Faculty Employees, Contractors, and Third Parties.
Records relating to complaints against administrators, non-faculty employees, contractors, and third parties shall be maintained by Title IX Office and the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Manager. When a party is found to have engaged in sexual misconduct, a letter will be placed in the party’s personnel file indicating that the EEO Manager maintains records of the sexual misconduct complaint.
5.6 Special Procedures for Educational Participants at USA Health Facilities
Notwithstanding any other provision of this policy to the contrary, this policy and its procedures shall govern the investigation and resolution of sexual misconduct occurring in USA Health’s operations only to the extent such sexual misconduct occurs in the context of an education program, such as a clinical experience for, or activity of USA Health, such as clinical experiences for health profession students (i.e. medical student, nursing student, physician assistant student, etc). Sexual misconduct that occurs elsewhere in USA Health’s operations is outside the scope of this policy and subject to resolution under other policies and procedures of USA Health unless the sexual misconduct implicates an education program or activity of the University itself.
If the respondent is a non-faculty employee, patient, guest, contractor, or other person affiliated with USA Health, and the alleged sexual misconduct occurred in an education program or activity of USA Health, the following procedures shall apply instead of those outlined in Section 5.5.3.3 with:
5.6.1 Investigator
Complaints under this process will be investigated by the TIX Investigator unless the TIX Investigator is the respondent, in which case the Title IX Coordinator will appoint someone else to investigate.
5.6.2 Investigation
Once the case is identified for formal resolution, the TIX Investigator will investigate to gather information and statements from witnesses and other sources for eventual review and consideration.
The investigation will involve interviews with the complainant, respondent, and witnesses and the collection of non-testimonial information and/or materials, such as emails, text messages, security camera footage, and the like. Witness information and/or materials may be identified and/or submitted by the parties or independently gathered by the TIX Investigator. Both parties will have equal opportunity to present witnesses, including both fact and expert witnesses, if permitted, together with other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. The TIX Investigator may decline to interview witnesses or collect information that the TIX Investigator deems irrelevant. The scope of the investigation shall be at the discretion of the TIX Investigator.
Before completion of the investigative report, the TIX Investigator will send the evidence collected for review in an electronic or hard copy format to each party and the party's advisor. The parties shall have ten (10) days to submit a written response to the TIX Investigator, which the TIX Investigator will consider before completion of the investigative report.
Throughout the investigation, the parties will have those rights specified in Section 4.4 of this policy.
Within ten (10) business days of the deadline for receipt by the TIX Investigator of written responses from the parties, the TIX Investigator will complete the investigation report and submit the final investigation report and any appended information to each party and the party’s advisor in an electronic format or a hard copy for their review.
Upon transmittal of the final investigation report by the TIX Investigator, the parties shall have five (5) business days to submit written questions that each respective party wants to be asked of any party or witness. The TIX Investigator will pose any questions to the other party or witness, as the case may be, and will provide each party with the answers. Each party will then be provided three (3) business days to submit any follow-up questions, which the investigator will pose to the other party or witness, as the case may be. All questions must be relevant to the allegations being investigated. Questions about the sexual history of the Complainant are generally impermissible and will be excluded under Section 5.4.2. The TIX Investigator will provide a written explanation to the appropriate party of any decision to exclude a question.
After any relevant follow-up questions have been posed and answered, the TIX Investigator will provide the final investigation report, together with any questions and answers posed by the parties, to the Chief Human Resources Officer of USA Health, or their designee, with a copy to the Title IX Coordinator. Upon receipt of the final investigation report, the Title IX Coordinator shall notify the parties of an expected decision date. While the University endeavors to conduct the formal resolution process within a reasonable time frame, the time that it takes to complete the process will be affected by circumstances such as the availability of parties or witnesses, scheduling conflicts, intervening breaks, prior attempts at informal resolution, the complexity of the case, and/or the need to avoid interference with a pending law enforcement investigation. The parties will receive written notification if extenuating circumstances are anticipated to result in lengthy delays.
The Chief Human Resources Officer of USA Health shall then identify an appropriate administrator with supervisory authority over the respondent. Together, the Chief Human Resources Officer and appropriate administrator will review the final investigation report and questions and answers from the parties and issue a written decision of the findings. There will be no live hearing.
The written decision of findings shall include identification of the allegations at issue, description of the procedural steps taken throughout the case, findings of fact supporting the determination, conclusions regarding the application of the Sexual Misconduct Policy, a statement and rationale as to the determination of each allegation, a statement of any disciplinary sanctions and whether any remedies will be provided to the complainant, and a description of the procedures and permissible grounds for appeal.
Sanctions may range from remedial education and training to removal from the University Community (i.e., dismissal or termination of employment), or any combination of the same.
5.6.3 Appeal of the Written Determination
Either party has the right to appeal the written decision of findings based only on the following grounds:
-
-
- Material and prejudicial violation of procedural rights that affected the outcome of the hearing;
- New information, not reasonably available before the decision, that could have affected the outcome;
- The discipline imposed is too severe or too lenient; and/or
- Conflict of interest or bias by the Title IX Coordinator, TIX Investigator, or other decision-makers that affected the outcome.
-
To appeal, the aggrieved party must submit a written statement of appeal within five (5) business days of being notified of the decision to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, or their designee, of USA Health. The written statement of appeal must include the grounds for appeal and describe the basis for the appeal in detail. In the event the written statement of appeal fails to state a permissible ground for appeal and/or does not describe the basis for the appeal, the appeal may be summarily dismissed. Within three (3) business days of receiving a valid appeal, the Chief Operating Officer, or a designee, will provide a copy of the written statement of appeal to the other party. Thereafter, the party so notified will have five (5) business days to submit a written response to the appeal.
The Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, or their designee, shall deliver simultaneous written notification of the outcome of the appeal and the rationale for the result to the parties within ten (10) business days after the deadline for submission of any written response to the appeal. The written determination becomes final upon the earlier of when: (i) the parties are notified of the determination on appeal, or (ii) the time to file an appeal has passed with neither party appealing.
The decision of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, or their designee, as applicable, is final.
5.6.4 Violations of Other University Policies
The Chief Human Resources Officer may determine that a violation of this policy did not occur (or was not proven to the required evidentiary standard) but that the behavior that occurred was unacceptable in the employment context. If the Chief Human Resources Officer and appropriate administrator make such a finding, the respondent shall be referred for proceedings or additional action as warranted by this or
any other University or USA Health policy, which may result in remediation or disciplinary action up to and including termination.
5.6.5 Records
All official records created during the formal resolution of a complaint shall be maintained by the University for a period of seven (7) years, including informal resolution records.
5.7 Special Procedures for Complaints Against the University President
If a complaint involves alleged sexual misconduct on the part of the University’s President, the TIX Investigator will investigate to gather testimony and other information for eventual review and consideration by the University Board of Trustees (Board) Vice Chair or a designee.
Any investigation, hearing, or appeal of alleged sexual misconduct involving the University President shall proceed in the manner set forth above for University administrators, except that the Board Vice Chair or a designee shall serve in the role of the HRHC and the Chair pro tempore or a designee shall serve in the role of the Sexual Misconduct Appeals Committee.
5.8 Special Procedures for Complaints Against the Title IX Coordinator
Any complaint involving allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of the Title IX Coordinator will be handled by this policy, except that any duties ordinarily performed by the Title IX Coordinator will instead be performed by a Deputy Title IX Coordinator appointed by the University President.
5.9 Special Procedures for Complaints Against the TIX Investigator
The University has a TIX Investigator who will normally conduct all required investigations by this policy, regardless of the classification of the respondent. However, if a complaint involves allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of the TIX Investigator, the Title IX Coordinator shall appoint an investigator to investigate the allegations. Otherwise, such complaints will follow the process for employees.
5.10 Objections to Process
Parties are expected to raise any objections, concerns, or complaints about the investigation, adjudication, and appeals process promptly so that the University may evaluate the matter and address it, as appropriate.
5.11 Vendors, Contractors, and Third Parties
The University does business with various vendors, contractors, and other third parties who are not students or employees of the University. Notwithstanding any rights that a given vendor, contractor, or third-party respondent may have under these procedures, the University retains all rights it enjoys by contract or law to modify or terminate its relationship with any vendor, contractor, or third-party irrespective of the outcome under this process. Where this policy specifies a period of days by which some act must be performed, the relevant period will be calculated as follows:
-
- Exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;
- Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays recognized by the federal government; and
- Include the last day of the period until 5:00 p.m. central time, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday recognized by the federal government, the period continues to run until 5:00 p.m. central time on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday recognized by the federal government.
All deadlines and other periods specified in this policy are subject to modification by the University where, in the University’s sole discretion, good cause exists.
The parties will be provided written notice of the modification of any deadline or period specified in this policy, along with the reasons for the modification.
Where this policy refers to notice being given to parties “simultaneously,” notice will be deemed simultaneous if it is provided in relative proximity on the same day. That notice doesn’t need to be provided at the same hour and minute.
Unless otherwise specified in this policy, the default method of transmission for all notices, reports, responses, and other forms of communication specified in this policy will be emailed using University email addresses. If a party does not have a University email address or wishes to use a personal email address instead of the University email address, the party must notify the Title IX Coordinator. The University is not responsible for outages, technical errors, or other features of a private email account that may interfere with a person’s receipt of the email. Therefore, a party is deemed to have received notice upon transmission of an email to their email account.
Any notice inviting or requiring a party or witness to attend a meeting, interview, or hearing will be provided with sufficient time for the party to prepare for the meeting, interview, or hearing as the case may be, and will include relevant details such as the date, time, location, purpose, and participants. Unless a specific number of days is specified elsewhere in this policy, the sufficient time to be provided will be determined at the sole discretion of the University, considering all the facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the nature of the meeting, interview, or hearing; the nature and complexity of the allegations at issue; the schedules of relevant University officials; approaching holidays or closures; and the number and length of extensions already granted.
6. Enforcement
Individuals found to violate this policy will be subject to disciplinary actions by the University. The discipline imposed will depend on all the facts and circumstances and may include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: a requirement not to repeat the conduct at issue, requiring training, written or verbal warning/reprimand, demotion, transfer or reassignment, denial of pay increases, probation, suspension (with or without pay and for varying lengths of time), limitation on participation in particular programs and activities, limitation on access to campus, expulsion, dismissal, or termination. Under certain circumstances, acts of sexual misconduct may also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.
7. Related Documents
7.1 Pregnant and Parenting Students
The èßäÊÓƵ is dedicated to creating an environment that is welcoming, accessible, and inclusive for pregnant and parenting students. Students may request reasonable accommodations for pregnancy and parenting-related conditions through the Title IX Office or /departments/studentaffairs/titlenine/pregnancy-parenting.html
7.2 Campus SaVE Act
The Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act, or Campus SaVE Act, is a federal law that promises prompt and effective responses by higher education institutions to incidents of sexual violence. At its core, the Campus SaVE Act increases transparency about incidents of sexual violence, guarantees complainants’ rights, sets standards for campus disciplinary proceedings, and requires campus-wide prevention education programs.
To understand the Campus SaVE Act, it’s important to first know a little about laws and the judicial process. Every state in the United States has laws against sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. To find out what the sexual violence laws are in the state where you attend college, check out .
Additionally, all colleges and universities have a judicial process for sexual misconduct that functions independently from state laws. While laws and judicial processes vary by state, by school, and by crime, the Campus SaVE Act, enforced as of March 2014, represents improvements to the handling of sexual misconduct on every U.S. college and university campus.
More information can be found at:
7.3 The Lowdown: A Student Handbook
The University is committed to informing its student population, as well as faculty and staff, of the University’s expectations and resources. This item can be found at the following link:
7.4 Discretion in Application
The University retains discretion to interpret and apply this policy in a manner that is not unreasonable, even if the University’s interpretation or application differs from the interpretation of the parties.
Despite the University’s reasonable efforts to anticipate all potential circumstances in drafting this policy, it is possible unanticipated or extraordinary circumstances may not be specifically or reasonably addressed by the express policy language, in which case the University retains the discretion to respond to the unanticipated or extraordinary circumstance in a way that is not unreasonable.
The provisions of this policy are not contractual in nature, whether in their own right or as part of any other express or implied contract. Accordingly, the University retains discretion to revise this policy at any time and for any reason. The University may apply policy revisions to an active case provided that doing so is not unreasonable.